Some activists in Lagos State under the aegis of the TakeItBack Movement have ripped into the decision of the state Commissioner of Police for authorizing that protest should not hold in memorial of the first anniversary of #EndSars.
The Human Rights group defended that they will go on with their protest.
This was made known in a statement titled ‘EndSars Anniversary: Lagos CP statement, an invitation to anarchy.’
The statement was signed by the activist’s Legal Adviser, Festus Ogun, who alleged that protest is a constitutional right.
According to the statement, it reads “The statement credited to the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, Hakeem Odumosu, warning citizens not to exercise their fundamental rights to protest during the commemoration of the #EndSars Massacre Anniversary is unconscionable, draconian and a reckless invitation to anarchy. Concerned Nigerians have taken his words like those of stand-up comedians.”
“CP Hakeem Odumosu has no such power, right, or authority to warn against, prohibit, or outlaw protests. That will be acting the fragile limits of his powers and against the constitution. He cannot, under our extant laws, interfere with the hallowed right to protest under any guise. The only legal duty he has is to ensure the security and welfare of all protesters; which must be professionally done.”
“#EndSars Memorial Demonstration is a constitutionally guaranteed right. Sections 39, 40, and 41 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as altered, safeguard, and guarantee the right to protest as a human right that shall be enjoyed by all citizens without arbitrary restraint or careless warning. Articles 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Enforcement and Ratification) Act equally protect the right to protest. Additionally, Articles 18-21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 fully protect the constitutional liberty to protest.”
“Emphasising the sacred nature of the right to protest is a constitutional democracy, the Court of Appeal in the case of IGP V. ANPP (2008) 12 WRN 65 held that “certainly in a democracy, it is the right of citizens to conduct peaceful processions, rallies or demonstrations without seeking and obtaining permission from anybody. It is a right guaranteed by the 1999 Constitution and any law that attempts to curtail such right is null and void and of no effect whatsoever”.
“A police notorious for extrajudicial killing, torture, extortion, and brutality lacks the legal and moral right to warn or caution victims on how to demand a better life. The audacity is provocative, scandalous, and insulting.”
“We shall not condone any form of harassment, intimidation, brutalization or arrest. We shall resist any attempt to encroach on our constitutionally guaranteed rights. The police and other security agencies are hereby put on notice and they should be guided accordingly.”
Thank you for taking your time in reading through our Journal Today. We wish to always provide you with qualitative Stories as far as GOOD-JOURNALISM is CONCERN. But good journalism costs a lot of money and only good journalism can ensure the possibility of a good society, accountability democracy, and a transparent government.
For continued free access to the best investigative journalism, we ask you to consider subscribing to our daily news updates.
